PROSPECTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY USE IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Authors

  • Alla AVSIYEVYCH Educational and Scientific Institute of Law named after Volodymyr the Great, Private Joint-Stock Company "Interregional Academy of Personnel Management" https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8192-8569

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31733/2078-3566-2023-5-114-117

Keywords:

arbitration, alternative dispute resolution methods, online arbitration, arbitration agreement.

Abstract

The article illuminates the contemporary aspects of employing online arbitration within the system of alternative methods for resolving legal conflicts. The author systematically examines the advantages and disadvantages of this method, offering insights from both foreign and domestic scholars. The discussion extends to the complexities of civil law and the legal process, emphasizing the contradictions in upholding public order within the online environment. This scholarly material is crucial for comprehending and analyzing modern trends in arbitration and alternative legal dispute resolution methods. The article provides a concise explanation of dispute resolution in cyberspace through information and communication technologies. It delves into specific research aspects related to the utilization of alternative dispute resolution methods, particularly the use of electronic arbitration. The paper addresses regulatory intricacies and dispute resolution nuances in cyberspace, ultimately concluding that the idea of abandoning offline dispute resolution methods in the near future may not be realized.

References

1. Притика Ю. Д. Онлайн арбітраж у системі альтернативних способів вирішення спорів: pro et contra. Проблеми цивільного права і процесу : тези доп. учасників практ. конф., присвяч. світлій пам’яті О. А. Пушкіна, Харків, 25 трав. 2018 р. С.58 61.

2. Арбітражний регламент ICC. 2012. URL : https://www.international arbitration attorney.com/uk/icc rules of arbitration 2012/

3. Rule Colin. Online Dispute Resolution for Business. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 2002. Ethan, Katsh. Bringing Online Dispute Resolution to Virtual Worlds: Creating Processes through Code. New York Law School Law Review. 2004. № 49. P. 275.

4. Almaguer Alejandro E. et al. Shaping New Legal Frontiers: Dispute Resolution for the Internet. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution. 1998.

5. Lide E. Casey. ADR and Cyberspace: The Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Online Commerce, Intellectual Property and Defamation. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution. 1996. № 12. P.719.

6. Frank Sander. lternative Methods of Dispute Resolution: An Overview. University of Florida Law Review. 1985. № 37 (1).

7. Pirie Andrew. Alternative Dispute Resolution: Skills, Science, and the Law Toronto: Irwin Law, 2000, p.42.

8. Katsh Ethan et al., Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. 2001. Pp.1 240.

9. Betancourt Julio Cesar, Zlatanska Elina. Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): What is is, and Is It the Way Forward? Arbitration, Issue. 2013. № 3. Pp. 256 264.

10. Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, Costs of International Arbitration Survey. London: Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. 2011. P. 2.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-02

How to Cite

AVSIYEVYCH, A. (2024). PROSPECTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY USE IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Scientific Bulletin of Dnipro State University of Internal Affairs, (1), 114–117. https://doi.org/10.31733/2078-3566-2023-5-114-117

Issue

Section

ISSUES OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LEGAL REGULATION OF SEPARATE SOCIAL RELATIONS