THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL FEATURES OF THE TACTICS OF PUBLIC USE BY CRIMINAL POLICE UNITS DURING OPERATIONAL AND INVESTIGATIVE SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the tactical features of the public’s voice use by the criminal police units during operational investigative support of criminal proceedings. The effectiveness of procedural actions is achieved by the skillful use and combination of overt and unspoken forces, measures and means used during their operative and investigative support. The tactic of using the public by criminal police units during the operational-investigative support of criminal proceedings in the system of operational-investigative tactics tentatively refers to special operational-investigative tactics. The advantage (value, social utility) of the use of members of the public over other covert forces of operational and investigative activity, which are used during operational and investigative support of criminal proceedings, is that the covert form (type) of such assistance in case of need (with the voluntary consent of a person) can flow into the voice at the next stages of criminal proceedings, and the public representative himself can act as a witness (the source of ideal traces of a criminal offense). It is the involvement of members of the public in the performance of certain actions during the operational-investigative provision of public investigative (search) actions with their voluntary consent that does not require their mandatory conspiracy. Tactics of public use of members of the public by criminal police units during operative investigative support for conducting public investigative (search) activities is determined by the tasks of operatives determined (assigned) to them by the investigator, prosecutor: independent conduct or performance of individual tasks.