INNOVATIVE APPROACHES IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2078-3566-2024-3-11

Keywords:

innovative approaches, administrative process, electronic justice, artificial intelligence, process automation, alternative methods of dispute resolution, virtual court processes, legal framework, cyber security, judicial system of Ukraine

Abstract

The article is devoted to the research of innovative approaches in the administrative process, which is an actual direction of the development of the legal system of Ukraine in the conditions of modern challenges and rapid technological progress. The purpose of the study is to comprehensively analyze the implementation of the latest technologies and methods in administrative proceedings, to identify the main problems that arise during their application, as well as to outline the prospects for the development of these approaches in the future. The author carries out a detailed analysis of existing innovative approaches, in particular, such as electronic justice, process automation, the use of artificial intelligence, the development of alternative dispute resolution methods and the introduction of virtual court processes. The advantages and disadvantages of each of these approaches are considered separately, as well as their impact on the efficiency, transparency and accessibility of administrative proceedings. It is emphasized that electronic justice and automation of routine procedures are the most important areas of development of the administrative process, which are already demonstrating their effectiveness. However, the author draws attention to the fact that in order to achieve the full potential of these technologies, it is necessary to overcome a number of legal and organizational barriers, such as the imperfection of the legal framework, insufficient technical preparation of the judicial system, as well as low qualification of personnel. Artificial intelligence and virtual court processes are considered promising technologies that can significantly change the nature of the administrative process in the future. The author notes that the use of artificial intelligence in the judiciary opens up new opportunities for increasing the accuracy and objectivity of judicial decisions, while at the same time creating new challenges related to issues of liability and cyber security. Virtual court processes, in turn, make it possible to ensure greater access to justice for citizens who cannot physically attend court sessions. The article pays special attention to the development of alternative methods of dispute resolution, such as mediation and arbitration, which can become an effective means of relieving the burden on courts and shortening the time of cases. At the same time, the author emphasizes the need for further development of the legal framework for the full implementation of these methods in the administrative process. The author also emphasizes the importance of integrating international experience in the implementation of innovative approaches into the national legal system of Ukraine. Using best practices from other countries, as well as cooperation with international organizations, can help avoid mistakes and speed up the process of modernization of the administrative process in Ukraine. The conclusions of the article emphasize the need for a comprehensive approach to the implementation of innovative approaches in the administrative process, covering technical, organizational and legislative aspects, as well as personnel training and ensuring legal certainty. The author emphasizes that the successful implementation of these approaches will help increase the efficiency of the judiciary, strengthen public trust in the judicial system, ensure justice and respect for human rights.

References

1. Shevchenko Y. The digitization of administrative justice in Ukraine. Teisinės minties šventė. 2022. P. 288–299. URL: https://cris.mruni.eu/server/api/core/bitstreams/afaf529b-58b0-4bb2-a3ed-7a25b456cde3/content.

2. Henman P. Administrative justice in a digital world. New York : The Oxford Handbook of Administrative Justice, 2020. 673 p.

3. Малетич М. Розвиток теоретико-правових підходів до розуміння сутності адміністративного процесу та його структури: порівняльно-правове дослідження. Науковий вісник міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Серія «Юриспруденція». 2020. № 48. С. 112–114.

4. Малетич М. Адміністративний процес в Україні в контексті адміністративно-правової реформи. Правові новели. 2021. № 13. С. 51–56.

5. Адміністративний процес України : монографія. Харків : ХНУВС : Майдан, 2019. 422 с. URL: https://dspace.univd.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/56fb692b-0382-4f2b-bdba-ab9d937860f5/content.

6. Сопільник Р. Вимоги до суддів у законодавстві про судовий устрій та статус суддів у Німеччині. Науковий вісник Львівського державного університету внутрішніх справ. Серія «Юридична». 2013. № 1. С. 474–485.

7. Савченко Г. Професійно-психологічна підготовка суддів: концептуальні засади. Сучасні проблеми порівняльного правознавства. 2015. С. 112–113.

8. Брижко В., Пилипчук В. Приватність, конфіденційність та безпека персональних даних. Інформація і право. 2020. № 1(32). С. 33–46.

9. International Journal of Law and Information Technology. 2010. Volume 18. Issue 4. Pages 301–331. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaq008.

10. Pryimak M. Innovative approaches to risk management in the field of public administration in Ukraine: prospects and limitations. Amazonia investiga. 2024. № 13.74. P. 308–322.

11. Наливайко Л., Романов А. Поняття, ознаки та значення транспарентності в контексті євроінтеграції. Visegrad journal on human rights. 2016. № 4/1. С. 158–163.

Published

2024-11-11

How to Cite

Korenev, A. (2024). INNOVATIVE APPROACHES IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS. Scientific Bulletin of Dnipro State University of Internal Affairs, (3), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.32782/2078-3566-2024-3-11

Issue

Section

PUBLIC-LEGAL AND PRIVATE-LEGAL REGULATION OF CERTAIN AREAS OF PUBLIC RELATIONS