UNIVERSALITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS AS AN AGGREGATION OF LAW AND MORALITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2078-3566-2024-3-04

Keywords:

universal rights, international standards, morality, social values, democracy

Abstract

The article substantiates the connection of the international concept of human rights in its origin and content with the European intellectual tradition and history. It is argued that this feature should not prevent the universalisation of such rights as a common standard for states and societies with different socio-political, cultural and religious backgrounds. The author emphasises that the issue of the universality of human rights goes beyond the scope of a separate theoretical problem, since international human rights standards claim to be directly applicable in the domestic sphere, having become one of the principles of international law. At the same time, the diversity of state policy in this area raises the question of the possibility and relevance of universal human rights. To substantiate the defining provisions of the article, the author uses classical methods of legal research: comparative analysis, formal and logical, historical, as well as the method of deconstruction (in terms of the origin of human rights) and critical ‘chain’ (with a view to assessing the nature of legal relativism and the ways to overcome it), and posthumanist methodology (in the course of substantiating the idea of universality of human rights on the basis of the systemic union of law and morality). The article substantiates that the origin of modern human rights is associated not only with the adoption of basic human rights documents, but also relies on the understanding of the events of the second half of the twentieth century, when international human rights standards became a driving factor in the evolution of international law in general, having a fundamental impact on the nature of the latter and spreading as an integral part of international legal discourse. Human rights ‘communicate’ morality to the law, strengthening the legitimacy of the legal norm; in turn, the law, relying on the universalism of these rights, endows moral prescriptions with legal force. By combining the power of law and the properties of morality, human rights recognised and protected by the State allow society to achieve the standards of a successful State recognised by a large part of humanity. It is proved that, despite the existing differences, universal human rights, which have been recognised at the international legislative level, are a common dimension that unites progressive humanity, testifying to its conscious rational choice of the path to success of an individual, society and the State.

References

1. Aristotle. Complete Works of Aristotle. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. Oxford: Princeton University Press. 1984.

2. Bentham J. Deontology or The Science of Morality: In Two Volumes. [S. l.] : Adegi Graphics LLC, 1999. 691 p.

3. Bucholc M., Canihac, H., Delmotte, F., & van Krieken, R. Law and (De)Civilization. An Introduction. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 2024. 49(2), 7–33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27302269

4. Domingo R. The individual in international law: A Natural Law Perspective. In Law and Religion in a Secular Age. 2023. pp. 138–157. Catholic University of America Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.9446873.11

5. Garcés M. F. E. Bridging a Fractured World: The Pact of the Future. Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development. 2024, 27, 24–35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48790035

6. Goodman R., & Jinks D. How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law. Duke Law Journal. 2004, 54(3). Р. 621–703. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40040439

7. Ingram D. Can Human Rights Be Reconciled with Modern Citizenship? Reconsidering Marx’s Zur Judenfrage Today. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia. 2024, 80(1/2). Р. 435–464. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27328808

8. Heymann J., Sprague A., Raub A., & Moseneke D. One in Thirty: Protecting Fundamental Rights for the World’s Migrants and Refugees. In Advancing Equality: How Constitutional Rights Can Make a Difference Worldwide (1st ed., pp. 71–96). University of California Press. 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1f8854w.8

9. Engle E. Universal human rights: a generational history. Annual Survey of International and Comparative Law. 2006, no. 12. Р. 219-268.

10. Kumari P. Comparative Regionalism: human rights policy of the EU and ASEAN. World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues. 2021, 25(4). Р. 42–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48654879

11. Kurian G.T. (ed. in ch.). The Encyclopedia of Political Science. Washington, CQ Press. 2011. 1801 p.

12. Марченко О.В. Права людини у вимірах західної і східної цивілізації. Науковий вісник Дніпропетровського державного університету внутрішніх справ. 2023. № 4. С. 19-27

13. Jahanbeglu R. Conversations with Isaiah Berlin. London, Halban Publishers, 2007. 224 p.

14. Talmon J.L. The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy. London, Secker & Warburg. 1995. 255 p.

Published

2024-11-11

How to Cite

Marchenko, O. (2024). UNIVERSALITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS AS AN AGGREGATION OF LAW AND MORALITY. Scientific Bulletin of Dnipro State University of Internal Affairs, (3), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.32782/2078-3566-2024-3-04

Issue

Section

ISSUES OF THEORY AND HISTORY OF STATE AND LAW, CONSTITUTIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LAW